Key result
A novel semi-automatic 3D transesophageal echocardiography segmentation technique accurately segmented the left atrial appendage in approximately 14 seconds with an average point-to-surface error of 0.88 mm, comparable to manual inter-observer variability.
Why the study?
Manual analysis of peri-procedural images for LAA occlusion device sizing is suboptimal, time-demanding, and highly variable between experts.
Does a semiautomatic LAA segmentation technique improve the accuracy and reproducibility of LAA measurements in 3-D TEE images compared to manual analysis?
Does a semiautomatic LAA segmentation technique improve the accuracy and reproducibility of LAA measurements in 3-D TEE images compared to manual analysis?
A novel semiautomatic 3-D TEE segmentation tool provides fast and highly reproducible LAA measurements, potentially improving procedural planning for LAA occlusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May speed LAA segmentation in 3D TEE; leaves open impact on occlusion planning or outcomes.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) has been generally described as "our most lethal attachment," being considered the major source of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Currently, LAA occlusion can be offered as a treatment for these patients, obstructing the LAA through a percutaneously delivered device. Nevertheless, correct device sizing is not straightforward, requiring manual analysis of peri-procedural images. This approach is suboptimal, time demanding, and highly variable between experts, which can result in lengthy procedures and excess manipulations. In this paper, a semiautomatic LAA segmentation technique for 3-D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images is presented. Specifically, the proposed technique relies on a novel segmentation pipeline where a curvilinear blind-ended model is optimized through a double stage strategy: 1) fast contour evolution using global terms and 2) contour refinement based on regional energies. To reduce its computational cost, and thus make it more attractive to real interventions, the B-spline explicit active surface framework was used. This novel method was evaluated in a clinical database of 20 patients. Manual analysis performed by two observers was used as ground truth. The 3-D segmentation results corroborated the accuracy, robustness to the variation of the parameters, and computationally attractiveness of the proposed method, taking approximately 14 s to segment the LAA with an average accuracy of ~0.9 mm. Moreover, a performance comparable to the interobserver variability was found. Finally, the advantages of the segmented model were evaluated, while semiautomatically extracting the clinical measurements for device selection, showing a similar accuracy but with a higher reproducibility when compared to the current practice. Overall, the proposed segmentation method shows potential for an improved planning of LAA occlusion, demonstrating its added value for normal clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morais et al. (2018) studied Left atrial appendage morphology assessment (n=20). Semi-automatic LAA segmentation technique (BEAS framework) vs. Manual analysis was evaluated on Segmentation accuracy (Point-to-surface error in mm). A novel semi-automatic 3D transesophageal echocardiography segmentation technique accurately segmented the left atrial appendage in approximately 14 seconds with an average point-to-surface error of 0.88 mm, comparable to manual inter-observer variability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: