Key result
A 3D surface extraction method (3D-S) improved reproducibility over 2D manual procedures for left atrial appendage characterization (e.g., CV 7.7% vs 17.1% for LAA ejection fraction).
Why the study?
Evaluating LAA function and morphology is crucial for LAA closure planning, but current standard image analysis relies on manual 2D contour delineation despite 3D imaging modalities.
Does a full 3D analysis (3D-S) improve the reproducibility of left atrial appendage measurements compared to standard 2D manual delineation in CT datasets?
Does a full 3D analysis (3D-S) improve the reproducibility of left atrial appendage measurements compared to standard 2D manual delineation in CT datasets?
A novel 3D surface extraction method for CT datasets improves the reproducibility of left atrial appendage morphological and functional measurements compared to standard 2D manual delineation, which may aid in LAA closure planning.
Purpose: The left atrial appendage (LAA) is responsible for thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation. The evaluation of both LAA function and morphology is crucial for the patient characterization and the preprocedural planning of LAA closure intervention. Despite the availability of 3D imaging modalities, the current standard image analysis is based on manual delineation of the LAA contours on 2D views. Methods: In this study, a comprehensive approach based on a full 3D analysis of the tomographic dataset by surface extraction and processing (3D-S) is presented. The proposed method allows extracting functional and morphologic information in the entire cardiac cycle by minimalizing manual user interaction. The proposed methodology has been validated on ten computer tomography datasets. Results: The proposed 3D-S method was feasible in all cases. Reproducibility was improved with respect to the reference 2D manual procedure (2D-S) (coefficient of variation 2.9 vs. 4.1% for diastolic ostium area; 3.8 vs. 6.1% for systolic ostium area; 2.4 vs. 5.3% for diastolic LAA volume; 2.7 vs. 5.9% for systolic LAA volume; and 7.7 vs. 17.1% for LAA ejection fraction). No significant differences were found between 2D-S and 3D-S measurements. Conclusions: In this study, we introduced a fully 3D approach for LAA characterization, allowing the simultaneous assessment of LAA function and geometry. The proposed approach could be used to improve the patient selection and the best sizing of the device for LAA closure and to allow a patient-specific 3D printing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vivoli et al. (2019) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=10). 3D surface extraction and processing (3D-S) vs. 2D manual procedure (2D-S) was evaluated on Reproducibility (coefficient of variation) of LAA measurements. A 3D surface extraction method (3D-S) improved reproducibility over 2D manual procedures for left atrial appendage characterization (e.g., CV 7.7% vs 17.1% for LAA ejection fraction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: