Key result
Telaprevir twice daily is noninferior to 8-hour dosing for sustained virological response at 12 weeks.
Why the study?
Does telaprevir twice daily produce noninferior sustained virological response compared to telaprevir every 8 hours in treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection?
RCT (n=740)
open-label
randomly assigned
Yes
Does telaprevir twice daily produce noninferior sustained virological response compared to telaprevir every 8 hours in treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection?
Telaprevir twice daily is noninferior to every 8 hours for achieving sustained virological response in treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, offering a more convenient dosing schedule.
Supports twice-daily telaprevir dosing for greater convenience; confirms noninferior SVR12 in treatment-naive genotype 1 HCV.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed an open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study of the safety and efficacy of twice-daily telaprevir in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection, including those with cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to groups treated with telaprevir 1125 mg twice daily or 750 mg every 8 hours plus peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 12 weeks; patients were then treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin alone for 12 weeks if their level of HCV RNA at week 4 was <25 IU/mL or for 36 weeks if their level was higher. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of telaprevir twice daily versus every 8 hours in producing a sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12) (based on a -11% lower limit of the 95% lower confidence interval for the difference between groups). RESULTS: At baseline, of 740 patients, 85% had levels of HCV RNA ≥800,000 IU/mL, 28% had fibrosis (F3-F4), 14% had cirrhosis (F4), 57% were infected with HCV genotype 1a, and 71% had the non-CC IL28B genotype. Of patients who were treated with telaprevir twice daily, 74.3% achieved SVR12 compared with 72.8% of patients who were treated with telaprevir every 8 hours (difference in response, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval, -4.9% to 12.0%), so telaprevir twice daily is noninferior to telaprevir every 8 hours. All subgroups of patients who were treated with telaprevir twice daily versus those who were treated every 8 hours had similar rates of SVR12. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in the telaprevir phase were fatigue (47%), pruritus (43%), anemia (42%), nausea (37%), rash (35%), and headache (26%); serious AEs were reported in 9% of patients. Rates of AEs and serious AEs were similar or slightly higher among patients treated with telaprevir every 8 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a phase 3 trial, telaprevir twice daily is noninferior to every 8 hours in producing SVR12, with similar levels of safety and tolerability. These results support use of telaprevir twice daily in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, including those with cirrhosis. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01241760.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buti et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection (n=740). telaprevir vs. telaprevir 750 mg every 8 hours was evaluated on sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12) (difference 1.5%, 95% CI -4.9 to 12.0). Telaprevir twice daily was noninferior to telaprevir every 8 hours for achieving sustained virological response at 12 weeks (74.3% vs 72.8%; difference 1.5%, 95% CI -4.9 to 12.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: