Key result
Factor V Leiden mutation linked to ~440% greater recurrent DVT risk versus non-carriers.
Why the study?
There were minimal case-control studies regarding the genetic composition and risk of inherited thrombophilia mutations within the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
Does the presence of inherited thrombophilia mutations increase the risk of VTE and recurrent thrombosis in young patients in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq?
Case-Control (n=247)
Does the presence of inherited thrombophilia mutations increase the risk of VTE and recurrent thrombosis in young patients in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq?
Odds Ratio: 5.4 (95% CI 0.778–37.505)
Absolute Event Rate: 71% vs 40%
p-value: p=0.041
Factor V Leiden mutation is a strong contributing factor for recurrent thrombosis in young patients in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, highlighting the need for targeted genetic screening in this population.
BackgroundInherited thrombophilia, particularly Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation, globally, stands as a known contributing factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there are minimal case-control studies about the genetic composition and risk of these mutations within the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI). This study's goal was to analyze the frequency and clinical significance of FVL, Prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T mutations in patients from Sulaymaniyah province.MethodsWithin this prospective case-control study, we analyzed 147 unselected patients (aged 18-49) with documented VTE (DVT, PE, or PVT) and 100 age and sex matched healthy controls. Molecular analysis was performed using multiplex PCR and reverse hybridization.ResultsIn the patient cohort, 55.8% had at least one prothrombotic mutation. The frequency of FVL was 14.3% in the patient cohort compared to 8% in the control group. FVL carriers showed a remarkably higher rate of recurrent thrombosis compared to non-carriers (71% vs. 40%; p = 0.041). Furthermore, FVL carriers had a five-fold increased risk for recurrent DVT (OR 5.4, 95% CI 0.778-37.505) and were significantly more likely to have a positive family history (p = 0.005). While MTHFR C677T was highly prevalent in both groups (48% patients, 49% controls), it was not identified to be an independent risk factor for VTE.ConclusionFVL is classified as a strong contributing factor for recurrent thrombosis in Sulaymaniyah. The high regional prevalence of FVL shows the need for targeted genetic screening in young patients, presenting with unprovoked or recurrent DVT, particularly when a family history is present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulqader et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=247). Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation vs. Non-carriers was evaluated on Recurrent thrombosis (OR 5.4, 95% CI 0.778-37.505, p=0.041). Factor V Leiden mutation carriers had a significantly higher rate of recurrent thrombosis than non-carriers (71% vs. 40%; p=0.041) and an increased risk for recurrent DVT (OR 5.4; 95% CI 0.778-37.505).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: