Key result
VSARR is linked to ~11% higher 8-year survival compared to VRARR.
Why the study?
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement is an alternative to valve-replacing aortic root replacement with valved-conduits based on recent guidelines, motivating an investigation into outcomes between these two procedures in patients with nonstenotic valves.
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement improve survival and reduce reoperation compared to valve-replacing aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis?
Population
475 patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis
Comparison
VSARR vs VRARR
Design
Propensity score-matched cohort study
Follow-up
8-year
Authors
Loading...
May support valve-sparing preference in suitable nonstenotic cases; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=475)
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement improve survival and reduce reoperation compared to valve-replacing aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 88.9%
p-value: p=0.025
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement is associated with improved 8-year survival and better valve hemodynamics compared to valve-replacing techniques in patients with aortic root aneurysm and nonstenotic valves.
Malaisrie et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Aortic root aneurysm without aortic stenosis (n=475). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) vs. Valve-replacing aortic root replacement (VRARR) was evaluated on Overall survival (p=0.025). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement was associated with significantly higher 8-year overall survival compared to valve-replacing aortic root replacement (100% vs. 88.9%; p=0.025).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: