Key result
Artificial neural network safely excludes suspected DVT without ultrasound more often than existing risk scores.
Why the study?
Artificial neural networks had not previously been applied to the risk stratification of patients presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis.
Does artificial neural network analysis improve the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis without ultrasound in patients with suspected DVT compared to existing risk assessment scores?
Observational (n=7,080)
Does artificial neural network analysis improve the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis without ultrasound in patients with suspected DVT compared to existing risk assessment scores?
Artificial neural network analysis can safely exclude deep vein thrombosis in more patients than traditional clinical scores, potentially reducing the need for unnecessary ultrasound imaging.
Should not yet change DVT diagnostic pathways; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Artificial neural networks are machine-learning algorithms designed to analyse data without a pre-existing hypothesis as to any associations that may exist. This technique has not previously been applied to the risk stratification of patients referred with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Current assessment is usually with a points-based clinical score, which may be combined with a D-dimer blood test. A neural network was trained to risk-stratify patients presenting with suspected DVT and its performance compared with existing tools. Data from 11 490 cases of suspected DVT presenting consecutively between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017 were analysed, and 7080 for whom all components of the Wells' score, a D-dimer and an ultrasound result were available were included in the analysis. The data were broken into a training set of 5270 patients, used to develop the algorithm, and a testing set of 1810 patients to assess performance of the trained algorithm. This network was able to exclude DVT without the need for ultrasound in significantly more patients than existing risk assessment scores, whilst retaining very low false negatives rates. More generally, this approach may improve the analysis of complex data to support decision-making in other areas of clinical medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willan et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n=7,080). Artificial neural network analysis vs. Existing risk assessment scores (Wells' score) was evaluated on Exclusion of DVT without the need for ultrasound and false negative rates. An artificial neural network excluded suspected DVT without ultrasound in significantly more patients than existing risk scores, while maintaining very low false negative rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: