Key result
Higher operator volume shows no link to better clinical success at high-volume hospitals.
Why the study?
Does higher annual operator volume improve in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions at high-volume hospitals?
Cohort (n=15,080)
Yes
Does higher annual operator volume improve in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions at high-volume hospitals?
In high-volume hospitals, operator volumes averaging 68 procedures per year achieve comparable in-hospital PCI outcomes to higher-volume operators, challenging historical volume thresholds.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support equivalent PCI success with moderate operator volumes at high-volume centers; leaves open whether volume thresholds matter outside this setting.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between annual operator volume and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) using contemporaneous data. BACKGROUND: The 1997 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association task force based their recommendation that interventionists perform > or = 75 procedures per year to maintain competency in PCI on data collected largely in the early 1990s. The practice of interventional cardiology has since changed with the availability of new devices and drugs. METHODS: Data were collected from 1994 through 1996 on 15,080 PCIs performed during 14,498 hospitalizations by 47 interventional cardiologists practicing at the five high volume (>600 procedures per hospital per year) hospitals in northern New England and one Massachusetts-based institution that support these procedures. Operators were categorized into terciles based on their annualized volume of procedures. Multivariate regression analysis was used to control for case-mix. In-hospital outcomes included death, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery (eCABG), non-emergency CABG (non-eCABG), myocardial infarction (MI), death and clinical success (> or = 1 attempted lesion dilated to < 50% residual stenosis and no death, CABG or MI). RESULTS: Average annual procedure rates varied across terciles from low = 68, middle = 115 and high = 209. After adjusting for case-mix, clinical success rates were comparable across terciles (low, middle and high terciles: 90.9%, 88.8% and 90.7%, Ptrend = 0.237), as were all the adverse outcomes including death (low-risk patients = 0.45%, 0.41%, 0.71%, Ptrend = 0.086; high-risk patients = 5.68%, 5.99%, 7.23%, Ptrend = 0.324), eCABG (1.74%, 2.05%, 1.75%, Ptrend = 0.733) and MI (2.57%, 1.90%, 1.86%, Ptrend = 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Using current data, there is no significant relationship between operator volumes averaging > or = 68 per year and outcomes at high volume hospitals. Future efforts should be directed at determining the generalizability of these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malenka et al. (1999) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary interventions (n=15,080). Annual operator volume vs. Low vs middle vs high volume terciles was evaluated on Clinical success (≥1 attempted lesion dilated to <50% residual stenosis and no death, CABG or MI) (p=0.237). Annual operator volume was not significantly associated with clinical success rates (90.9%, 88.8%, and 90.7% for low, middle, and high terciles, respectively; Ptrend=0.237) at high-volume hospitals.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: