Key result
High operator PCI volume fails to reduce in-hospital MACCE compared to lower volumes.
Why the study?
The relationship between operator volume and outcomes of PCI in patients with STEMI has not been fully investigated.
Does high operator volume improve in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI?
Cohort (n=8,282)
Yes
Does high operator volume improve in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI?
Odds Ratio: 0.91 (95% CI 0.76–1.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.9% vs 10.4%
p-value: p=0.327
In a nationwide Korean registry, operator volume was not significantly associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes following primary PCI for STEMI.
Operator volume showed no association with in-hospital STEMI PCI outcomes; leaves open whether volume thresholds affect safety in real-world practice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The relationship between operator volume and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been fully investigated. We aimed to investigate the relationship between operator PCI volume and in-hospital outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI. METHODS: Among the total of 44,967 consecutive cases of PCI enrolled in the Korean nationwide, retrospective registry (K-PCI registry), 8,282 patients treated with PCI for STEMI by 373 operators were analyzed. PCI volumes above the 75th percentile (>30 cases/year), between the 75th and 25th percentile (10-30 cases/year), and below the 25th percentile (<10 cases/year) were defined as high, moderate, and low-volume operators, respectively. In-hospital outcomes including mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, stroke, and urgent repeat PCI were analyzed. RESULTS: The average number of primary PCI cases performed by 373 operators was 22.2 in a year. In-hospital mortality after PCI for STEMI was 571 cases (6.9%). In-hospital outcomes by operator volume showed no significant differences in the death rate, cardiac death, non-fatal MI, and stent thrombosis. However, the rate of urgent repeat PCI tended to be lower in the high-volume operator (0.6%) than in the moderate-(0.7%)/low-(1.5%) volume operator groups (p=0.095). The adjusted odds ratios for adverse in-hospital outcomes were similar in the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis also showed that operator volume was not a predictor for adverse in-hospital outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI were not associated with operator volume in the K-PCI registry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=8,282). High operator volume (>30 cases/year) vs. Moderate (10-30 cases/year) and low (<10 cases/year) operator volume was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) during hospitalization (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.1, p=0.327). High operator volume (>30 cases/year) was not significantly associated with a reduction in in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared to lower operator volumes (OR 0.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: