Key result
Limited reperfusion cuts skeletal muscle infarct size ~73% vs. normal reperfusion.
Why the study?
Does limiting the rate of reperfusion blood flow reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in a canine skeletal muscle model?
Does limiting the rate of reperfusion blood flow reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in a canine skeletal muscle model?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 41%
p-value: p=<0.05
Limiting the hyperemic rate of reperfusion blood flow significantly reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury and edema in skeletal muscle.
Hypothesis-generating for controlled reperfusion in muscle ischemia-reperfusion; should not change practice pending human studies.
The mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury in skeletal muscle remain controversial. We investigated the effect of the rate of reperfusion blood flow on I-R injury in an isolated in vivo canine gracilis muscle model in six anesthetized dogs. In all animals, both gracilis muscles were subjected to 6 hr of ischemia followed by 1 hr of reperfusion. During reperfusion, one gracilis artery was partially occluded to limit the rate of reperfusion blood flow to its preischemic rate (limited reperfusion, LR), while the contralateral artery was allowed to perfuse freely at a normal rate (normal reperfusion, NR). Muscle injury was quantified by histochemical staining (triphenyltetrazolium chloride, TTC) with computerized planimetry of the infarct size, and by spectrophotometric determination of technetium-99m pyrophosphate uptake. Endothelial permeability was quantified by measurement of gracilis muscle weight gain and 125I-albumin radioactivity after intravenous injection. Results are presented as the means +/- SEM, and differences are considered to be statistically significant if P less than 0.05 by Student's t test for paired data. LR resulted in significantly less blood flow (9.7 +/- 1.7 cc/min/100 g) when compared to NR (55.7 +/- 11.6 cc/min/100 g). I-R injury was significantly reduced by LR as evidenced by a decrease in TTC infarct size from 41 +/- 7% to 11 +/- 5%, and a decrease in technetium-99m pyrophosphate uptake from 512 +/- 20 to 163 +/- 44 X 10(3) counts/min/g. LR also significantly decreased the postreperfusion edema formation as evidenced by a reduction in the muscle weight gain from 27 +/- 6 to 9 +/- 1 g, and a reduction in the 125I-albumin radioactivity from 45 +/- 14 to 32 +/- 8 counts/min/g. These data suggest that the hyperemic rate of reperfusion blood flow is a significant factor in the pathophysiology of postreperfusion edema and that clinical control of reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle may be achieved by limiting the rate of reperfusion blood flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (1988) studied Ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle (n=6). Limited reperfusion (LR) vs. Normal reperfusion (NR) was evaluated on Muscle injury quantified by TTC infarct size (p=<0.05). Limited reperfusion significantly reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle compared to normal reperfusion, decreasing TTC infarct size from 41% to 11% (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: