Key result
DOACs show similar ICH risk to LMWH in patients with brain metastases.
Why the study?
Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly prescribed for cancer-associated thrombosis, but limited data exist regarding their safety in patients with brain metastases.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with brain metastases?
Cohort (n=96)
Blinded outcome assessment
Yes
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with brain metastases?
DOACs appear to have a comparable safety profile to LMWH regarding the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with brain metastases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports comparable ICH safety of DOACs vs LMWH in brain metastases; observational data leaves open need for RCTs.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed in treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, but limited data exist regarding safety of DOACs in patients with brain metastases. We aimed to determine the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with brain metastases receiving DOACs or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation. An international 2-center retrospective cohort study was designed. Follow-up started on the first day of concomitant anticoagulation and brain tumor diagnosis. At least 2 brain imaging studies were mandated. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of any spontaneous ICH at 12-month follow-up with death as a competing risk. Major ICH was defined as spontaneous, ≥10 mL in volume, symptomatic, or requiring surgical intervention. Imaging studies were centrally reviewed by a neuroradiologist blinded for anticoagulant type. PANWARDS (platelets, albumin, no congestive heart failure, warfarin, age, race, diastolic blood pressure, stroke) score for prediction of ICH was calculated. We included 96 patients with brain metastases (41 DOAC, 55 LMWH). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major ICH was 5.1% in DOAC-treated patients and 11.1% in those treated with LMWH (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-2.21). When anticoagulation was analyzed as a time-varying covariate, the risk of any ICH did not differ between DOAC- and LMWH-treated patients (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.28-3.40). PANWARDS score was not associated with ICH risk. This international 2-center study suggests comparable safety of LMWH and DOACs in patients with brain metastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leader et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Brain metastases with venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation (n=96). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was evaluated on Cumulative incidence of any spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at 12-month follow-up (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.28-3.40). In patients with brain metastases, DOACs were associated with a similar risk of any intracranial hemorrhage and major intracranial hemorrhage compared to LMWH.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: