Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of polishing techniques on a 3D-printed resin for provisional prosthesis through an in vitro assessment of surface roughness and mechanical strength. Methods Bar-shaped specimens (25 × 12 × 2 mm) were fabricated using a 3D-printed provisional resin at a 0° angle to the platform and divided into three experimental groups (n=10): no polishing (AP), mechanical polishing (PM), and chemical polishing (PQ). Surface analysis was performed with a stereomicroscope, and roughness parameters (Ra, Rq, Rz) were obtained with a confocal microscope. Flexural strength and modulus were also determined, followed by qualitative evaluation of the fracture pattern. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA (p<0.05) and Tukey’s test when appropriate. Results Distinct surface characteristics were observed among groups, with statistically significant differences for Ra (p=0.003) and Rq (p=0.002), while Rz showed no significance (p=0.063). Flexural strength (p<0.001) and flexural modulus (p=0.002) also differed significantly between groups. Conclusion Polishing techniques tested on a 3D-printed resin for provisional prosthesis significantly influenced Ra, Rq, flexural strength, and flexural modulus, but showed no significant effect on Rz.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: