Key result
Unfractionated heparin increases clinical pregnancy rates ~116% versus no antithrombotics in recurrent IVF failure.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to elucidate the possible role of unfractionated heparin in patients with failed repeated IVF-ET and thrombophilia.
Does unfractionated heparin improve pregnancy and implantation rates in women with recurrent IVF-ET failures?
RCT (n=86)
Randomized
Does unfractionated heparin improve pregnancy and implantation rates in women with recurrent IVF-ET failures?
Absolute Event Rate: 30.2% vs 14%
Unfractionated heparin significantly improves clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in women with recurrent IVF-ET failures.
Case-control data suggest possible heparin benefit in recurrent IVF failure; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective: To elucidate the possible role of unfractionated heparin in patients with failed repeated in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and thrombophilia. Methods: This case control study evaluated the efficacy of the unfractionated heparin in increasing the pregnancy and implantation ratio in women with recurrent IVF-ET failures. Eighty-six women received in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with a record of three or more previous IVF-ET failures. Participants were randomly distributed into two groups. Group A ( n =43) received unfractionated heparin 5 000 IU twice daily, and group B ( n =43) did not take any antithrombotic drugs. Coagulation abnormalities such as factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation, methylene tetra hydro folate reductase (MTHFR) mutation and prothrombin mutation (FII) were evaluated. Age, body mass index, basal follicular stimulating hormone, basal estradiol, duration of infertility, and number of IVF-ET failures were compared between two groups. Results: 45.0% and 17.4% of women were pregnant with and without MTHFR and prothrombin mutation, respectively, when they received unfractionated heparin treatment. The implantation rate was more in group A (12.5%) than group B (4.3%) and differences in the fertilization rate of the two groups were observed (27.7% vs . 35.9%). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was remarkably more in group A (30.2%) than group B (14.0%). Conclusions: Heparin is a safe and valuable treatment for patients with repeated IVF-ET failures. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates are higher in the heparin-treated group in contrast with the control group. Trial registration: The trial registration was done with clinical registration number of “ IRCT138807202575N1”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirmohamadi et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Recurrent IVF-ET failures (n=86). Unfractionated heparin vs. No antithrombotic drugs was evaluated on Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle. Unfractionated heparin increased the clinical pregnancy rate (30.2% vs 14.0%) and implantation rate (12.5% vs 4.3%) compared to no antithrombotic drugs in women with recurrent IVF-ET failures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: