Key result
Combined pre-capillary and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension was not associated with decreased pulmonary artery diastolic pressure reduction compared to isolated post-capillary PH (15.2 vs 9.88 mmHg; P=0.12).
Why the study?
Does baseline diastolic pressure gradient affect the reduction in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure in chronic heart failure patients managed with a CardioMEMS HF sensor?
Observational (n=32)
Does baseline diastolic pressure gradient affect the reduction in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure in chronic heart failure patients managed with a CardioMEMS HF sensor?
Absolute Event Rate: 15.2% vs 9.88%
p-value: p=0.12
Remote hemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS achieves similar pulmonary artery diastolic pressure reductions in heart failure patients regardless of whether they have isolated post-capillary or combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension.
Supports comparable CardioMEMS response across PH subtypes in HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Aims Remote haemodynamic monitoring (RHM) decreases hospitalization rates in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Many patients with chronic HF develop pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to left heart disease with some acquiring combined pre-capillary and post-capillary PH (Cpc-PH). The efficacy of RHM in achieving pulmonary pressure reductions in patients with Cpc-PH vs. isolated post-capillary PH (Ipc-PH) is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a higher baseline diastolic pressure gradient (DPGbaseline) measured at the time of CardioMEMS™ HF sensor implantation is associated with lower reductions in pulmonary artery diastolic pressures (PADP). Methods and results This was a retrospective analysis of 32 patients meeting clinical indications for CardioMEMS™ implantation. DPGbaseline categorized patients as Cpc-PH (DPG ≥ 7 mmHg) or Ipc-PH (DPG < 7 mmHg). Minimum achievable PADP (PADPmin) and ∆PADP (PADPbaseline − PADPmin) were determined. Pearson's correlation analysis and comparison of mean pressure changes were assessed. Median age was 69 years, and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 25%. Eight patients (25%) had a LVEF ≥40%. Twenty-five patients (78%) met criteria for Ipc-PH and seven (22%) for Cpc-PH. Neither PADPmin (ρ = 0.27; P = 0.13) nor ΔPADP (ρ = 0.07; P = 0.72) was correlated with DPGbaseline. A trend towards higher ΔPADP was seen in Cpc-PH vs. Ipc-PH patients (15.2 vs. 9.88 mmHg; P = 0.12). There was a moderate positive correlation between baseline PADP and ΔPADP [ρ = 0.55 (0.26–0.76); P < 0.001]. Conclusions Decreased PADP reduction was not seen in Cpc-PH vs. Ipc-PH patients. Higher PADPbaseline was associated with greater ΔPADP. Larger studies are needed to elaborate our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolfson et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=32). Combined pre-capillary and post-capillary PH (Cpc-PH) vs. Isolated post-capillary PH (Ipc-PH) was evaluated on Reduction in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (ΔPADP) (p=0.12). Combined pre-capillary and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension was not associated with decreased pulmonary artery diastolic pressure reduction compared to isolated post-capillary PH (15.2 vs 9.88 mmHg; P=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: