Although many studies have shown a relationship between forest t^pe and quality on resident lepidopteran assemblages, there appears to be an absence of sucb studies in Pacific island countries.This study compared nocturnal macro-moth assemblages in a native rainforest, mixed forest and a plantation of exotic trees (mahogany) near Suva, Fiji Islands.Four nighdy surveys (4 h from dusk) were performed in each forest type using a mercuiy vapour light.A total of 491 macro¬ moths belonging to 92 species in nine families were collected.No statistically significant differences in abundance, species richness and various diversity indices were observed across the different forest types.Endemic species were collected in all three locations, although significantly more endemic individuals were collected in the native forest compared to the exotic plantation.When examining species composition, 'analysis of similarity' (ANOSIM) and non-metric multidimensional scaling suggested that the faunas obsei'ved in the mixed forest and the exotic forest might be different, with the fauna in the native forest intermediate between these two.Although we found no major differences in the moth assemblages in these three sites, the results collected provide baseline data for future studies and comparisons with other localities.The results also reinforce previous findings which demonstrate that exodc plantations and semi-degraded forests may still provide useful refuges for endemic insect species of conservation value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tikoca et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: