Key result
Maternal and neonatal LVNC results in maternal HF and neonatal death.
Case Report (n=2)
Demonstrates a familial case of noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium in a pregnant woman and her neonate, emphasizing the importance of early fetal echocardiographic screening and multidisciplinary management.
Rare familial noncompaction cardiomyopathy in pregnancy signals potential risks; leaves open optimal screening and management strategies.
Noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium (NCLV) is an uncommon congenital cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis. We describe a case of NCLV that developed in a pregnant woman and her neonate. A nulliparous woman was referred at 24 weeks' gestation due to dyspnea and fetal hydrops. Maternal echocardiography demonstrated NCLV with characteristic findings of prominent and excessive ventricular trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses in the left ventricle. An M-mode echocardiography suggested depressed left ventricular systolic function. A fetal echocardiography at 24 weeks' gestation demonstrated cardiomegaly, but morphologic findings were not definitive for NCLV. An emergency cesarean section was performed due to maternal heart failure. A neonatal echocardiography diagnosed NCLV with depressed left ventricular systolic function. The neonate died of cardiac failure on the second day of life. Autopsy confirmed the echocardiographic findings. Since patients with NCLV may develop heart failure, multidisciplinary management is mandatory. In addition, awareness of familial occurrence of NCLV should be kept in mind for early diagnosis in the fetus and neonate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitao et al. (2004) conducted a case report in Noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium (NCLV) (n=2). Noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium was evaluated. A pregnant woman and her neonate were diagnosed with noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium, resulting in maternal heart failure and neonatal death.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: