Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of eye-drop interferon (IFN) α-2b 1 millionIU/mL with eye-ointment tacrolimus 0.03% in refractory vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with VKC refractory to conventional treatment with topical corticosteroids and antihistamines after 4 weeks of regular use were selected retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received eye-ointment tacrolimus 0.03% three times a day or eye-drop IFN alpha-2b 1 millionIU/mL three times a day and were followed up for 24 months. The main outcome measures were total subjective symptom score (TSSS) and total objective ocular score (TOSS). RESULTS: Mean baseline TSSS was 7.24±1.98 in Group A (tacrolimus group) and 7.84±1.82 in Group B (IFN group), and it reduced to 1.12±0.83 in Group A and 0.62±0.41 in Group B at 6 months, which was statistically significant compared to the baseline score (p<0.05) as well as between the two groups. Mean baseline TOSS was 6.72±2.07 in Group A and 6.56±2.04 in Group B, and it improved to 1 month onwards to 1.52±0.87 in Group A and 1.0±0.71 in Group B at 6 months, which was statistically significant compared to the baseline score (p<0.05) as well as between the two groups. Side effects like stinging and burning sensations were seen in the tacrolimus group only. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that while both eye-drop IFN α-2b 1 millionIU/mL and eye-ointment tacrolimus eye ointment 0.03% are both safe and effective steroid-sparing agents in steroid-resistant VKC. IFN α-2b results in greater improvement in subjective symptoms and objective signs, has fewer side effects in long term and is better tolerated as compared to tacrolimus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: