Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An integrated maternity care organization, involving primary and secondary maternity care providers, working with the insurer, redesigned two maternity care pathways — one for gestational diabetes mellitus and one for pain relief during labor — to develop an outcome-based shared-savings model, building on an existing bundled-payment arrangement. The care pathways were evaluated using time-driven activity-based costing, process indicators, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. The new pathway for gestational diabetes mellitus led to fewer referrals to internal medicine, reduced need for insulin therapy, improved patient-reported experiences, and substantial cost savings. The new pathway for pain relief led to a reduction in obstetrician-led pain relief use, but clinical outcomes, patient-reported experiences, and costs remained largely unchanged. Given the savings achieved in the diabetes pathway, a shared-savings model was developed, with the allocation of savings based on meeting an outcome-based benchmark. This model demonstrates how outcomes can be incorporated into payment models to reward value-improving behavior. Despite the successful development of the model, there were significant challenges, including aligning cost data with existing reimbursement structures. Nonetheless, the collaboration built a foundation for future innovations in value-based maternity care delivery and payment reform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: