Key result
Post-MI statin prescribing in Estonia increases by ~52% between 2004 and 2018.
Why the study?
Relatively high adherence to myocardial infarction secondary prevention medications has been reported, but register-based, objective real-world data remained scarce.
Has adherence to guideline-recommended secondary prevention medications after myocardial infarction improved over time in a real-world setting?
Observational (n=9,967)
Yes
Has adherence to guideline-recommended secondary prevention medications after myocardial infarction improved over time in a real-world setting?
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 44%
p-value: p=<0.001
Real-world data from Estonia shows improved adherence to statins and beta-blockers for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction between 2004-2005 and 2017-2018, though ACEi/ARB adherence declined.
Improved post-MI medication adherence in Estonia supports sustained guideline implementation; leaves open optimization for age/gender subgroups and dosing.
Background: Relatively high rates of adherence to myocardial infarction (MI) secondary prevention medications have been reported, but register-based, objective real-world data is scarce.We aimed to analyse adherence to guideline-recommended medications for secondary prevention of MI in 2017-2018 (period II) and compare the results with data from 2004-2005 (period I) in Estonia.Methods: Study populations were formed based on data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund's database and on Estonian Myocardial Infarction Register. By linking to the Estonian Medical Prescription Centre database adherence to guideline-recommended medications for MI secondary prevention was assessed for one year follow-up period from the first hospitalization due to MI. Data was analysed using the defined daily dosages methodology. Results: Total of 6694 and 6060 cases of MI were reported in periods I and II, respectively. At least one prescription during the follow up period was found for beta-blockers (BB) in 81.0 % and 83.5 % (p = 0.001), for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) in 76.9 % and 66.0 % (p < 0.001), and for statins in 44.0 % and 67.0 % (p < 0.001) of patients in period I and II, respectively. P2Y12 inhibitors were used by 76.4 % of patients in period II. The logistic regression analysis adjusted to gender and age revealed that some drugs and drug combinations were not allocated similarly in different age and gender groups. Conclusions: In Estonia, adherence to MI secondary prevention guideline-recommended medications has improved. But as adherence is still not ideal more attention should be drawn to MI secondary prevention through systematic guideline implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lõiveke et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction (n=9,967). Time period (2017-2018) vs. Time period (2004-2005) was evaluated on At least one prescription for statins during the 1-year follow-up period (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: