Key result
Underweight and extreme obesity linked to up to ~164% higher in-hospital mortality after CABG.
Why the study?
The association between body mass index and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting remains controversial.
Does extreme Body Mass Index (BMI ≤19 or ≥40 kg/m2) increase in-hospital mortality and length of stay in patients undergoing CABG compared to those with a BMI of 20-39 kg/m2?
Cohort (n=48,710)
Yes
Does extreme Body Mass Index (BMI ≤19 or ≥40 kg/m2) increase in-hospital mortality and length of stay in patients undergoing CABG compared to those with a BMI of 20-39 kg/m2?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extreme BMI (underweight and extreme obesity) is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality following CABG, confirming the obesity paradox in a real-world setting.
Background: The association between Body Mass Index (BMI) and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. Our objective was to investigate the real-world relationship between BMI and in-hospital clinical course and mortality, in patients who underwent CABG. Methods: A sampled cohort of patients who underwent CABG between October 2015 and December 2016 was identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, peri-procedural complications and length of stay. Patients were divided into 6 BMI (kg/m2) subgroups; (1) under-weight ≤19, (2) normal-weight 20–25, (3) over-weight 26–30, (4) obese I 31–35, (5) obese II 36–39, and (6) extremely obese ≥40. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. Linear regression model was used to identify predictors of length of stay (LOS). Results: An estimated total of 48,710 hospitalizations for CABG across the U.S. were analyzed. The crude data showed a U-shaped relationship between BMI and study population outcomes with higher mortality and longer LOS in patients with BMI ≤ 19 kg/m2 and in patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 compared to patients with BMI 20–39 kg/m2. In the multivariable regression model, BMI subgroups of ≤19 kg/m2 and ≥40 kg/m2 were found to be independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: A complex, U-shaped relationship between BMI and mortality was documented, confirming the “obesity paradox” in the real-world setting, in patients hospitalized for CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbaz‐Greener et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) (n=48,710). Underweight Body Mass Index (≤19 kg/m²) vs. Normal-weight Body Mass Index (20-25 kg/m²) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.48-4.71, p=<0.001). A U-shaped relationship was observed between BMI and in-hospital mortality following CABG, with underweight (OR 2.64) and extremely obese (OR 1.71) patients having significantly higher mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: