Key result
The widespread historical use of intravenous lidocaine for the suppression of life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiac arrest resuscitation was based on tenuous evidence.
Why the study?
Does intravenous amiodarone or intravenous lidocaine improve outcomes in cardiac arrest resuscitation?
Population
Patients undergoing cardiac arrest resuscitation
Design
Editorial
Authors
Loading...
The widespread historical use of intravenous lidocaine in cardiac arrest resuscitation was based on tenuous evidence, setting the stage for its potential demise.
Does intravenous amiodarone or intravenous lidocaine improve outcomes in cardiac arrest resuscitation?
The widespread historical use of intravenous lidocaine in cardiac arrest resuscitation was based on tenuous evidence, setting the stage for its potential demise.
Bramah N. Singh (2002) conducted an editorial in Cardiac arrest and life-threatening arrhythmias. Intravenous lidocaine was evaluated. The widespread historical use of intravenous lidocaine for the suppression of life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiac arrest resuscitation was based on tenuous evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: