OBJECTIVES: values in a convenience sample of individuals with SCI (between the fourth cervical and sixth thoracic spinal segments). DATA SOURCES: Searches for this scoping review were conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web Science. STUDY SELECTION: reported and measured directly during CPET to volitional exhaustion. Full-text review identified studies published before April 2021 for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included authors name, journal name, publication year, participant characteristics, and comprehensive information relevant to CPET. DATA SYNTHESIS: values differed significantly (P<.001) between averaging strategies, with epoch length explaining 56% of the variability. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of accepted and standardized methods for processing and analyzing CPET data are needed to ensure high-quality, reproducible research, and inform population-specific normative values for individuals with SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alrashidi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: