Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since the early 1980s, a large body of research has thrown doubt on the relevance of macroeconomic models for understanding exchange rates. The authors argue that a balanced reading of recent literature in exchange rate economics gives a more optimistic assessment. Many studies have established the pertinence of long-run purchasing power parity (PPP) and the explanatory power of macroeconomic fundamentals in real exchange rate fluctuations. A reasonably strong case can be made for a traditional macroeocnomic interpretation of real exchange rates, which emphasizes short-run price stickiness, but long-run PPP. But a central new ingredient in this interpretation is the presence of international commodity market segmentation and persistent deviations from the 'law of one price.' An example is given of a dynamic general equilibrium model that can reproduce some of the observed features of real exchange rate fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael B. Devereux (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: