Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Arabic sources of the ninth and tenth centuries are valuable yet poorly studied material on the expansion of Scandinavians, called Rus by these writers, into Eastern Europe. While these sources have usually been introduced as auxiliary material for other witnesses, such as the Slavonic Primary Chronicle and Old Norse and Byzantine writings, there are ample grounds to examine their accounts as an independent body of information. A comparison of Arabic and non-Arabic accounts on the Rus reveals important geographical, social, and cultural differences in their descriptions, opening up a new perspective on this chapter of the Viking Age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Þórir Jónsson Hraundal (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: