Adduct formation between α-, β-, γ-, and (permethyl)γ-cyclodextrins (CDs) on the one hand and 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH) on the other was studied by fluorescence spectroscopy in a DMF/water mixed solvent. The four complexes, CD−DPH, were found to exhibit remarkable differences in their structures. Thus, while the α- and β-homologues form 1/1 complexes with DPH, γ-homologue forms nanotubes involving ca. 30 cyclodextrin units and an unknown number of DPH molecules. If, however, the hydrogens of all the OH groups in the γ-cyclodextrin are replaced by CH 3 groups, nanotubes do not form. Also, when the alkalinity of an aqueous solution, in which γ-CD and DPH have formed nanotubes, is increased above pH = 12, the nanotubes break down. Moreover, nanotube formation does not occur also when DPH is replaced by certain of its derivatives, very similar to it in structure and rodlike in shape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pistolis et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: