This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The structure of fractures and pores has a dominant impact on the heat transfer-seepage-deformation process of a coal seam. Previous models have primarily used the cubic permeability model to characterize coal seam permeability properties. In this study, we developed a new multi-field coupling model, which includes fracture and pore structure, coal seam temperature, effective stress and gas seepage. Two major extraction scenarios were simulated: the unconstrained plane strain state and the uniaxial plane strain state. In addition, two microstructural parameters were applied to characterize coal permeability: maximum fracture length and the fractal dimension for the fracture. The results show that the fractal seepage model provides a more realistic and reliable characterization of resource migration and extraction processes in unconventional reservoirs than the cubic-law permeability model. Compared with the cubic-law permeability model, the permeability calculated by the model proposed in this paper changes about 17.09%-91.56%. Furthermore, coal seam permeability is proportional to the maximum fracture length and the fractal dimension for the fracture. The permeability changes about 17.09% and 17.18% with the different fractal dimension, and about 87.17% and 91.56% with the different maximum fracture length. However, the fractal dimension and coal seam permeability are inversely proportional to seam temperature. Cited as : Ye, D., Liu, G., Gao, F., Xu, R., Yue, F. A multi-field coupling model of gas flow in fractured coal seam. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(1): 104-118, doi: 10.46690/ager.2021.01.10
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: