Key result
PISA highly correlates with quantitative Doppler for measuring EROA and RSV in canine MR.
Why the study?
The accuracy and reproducibility of calculating mitral regurgitant orifice area using the PISA method, and the effect of general anesthesia on mitral regurgitation in dogs, required determination.
Does the PISA method accurately quantify mitral regurgitation compared to quantitative Doppler echocardiography in dogs?
Does the PISA method accurately quantify mitral regurgitation compared to quantitative Doppler echocardiography in dogs?
The PISA method is an accurate and reproducible technique for quantifying mitral regurgitation in both experimental and clinical canine models, with ERO area being less dependent on hemodynamics than other measurements.
Supports PISA for canine MR quantification; extends validation in animal models yet leaves open clinical adoption.
The present study was performed to determine the accuracy and reproducibility of calculating the mitral regurgitant orifice area with the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method in dogs with experimental mitral regurgitation and in canine patients with chronic mitral insufficiency and to evaluate the effect of general anesthesia on mitral regurgitation. Eight adult, Beagle dogs for experimental mitral regurgitation and 11 small breed dogs with spontaneous mitral regurgitation were used. In 8 Beagle dogs, mild mitral regurgitation was created by disrupting mitral chordae or leaflets. Effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area was measured by the PISA method and compared with the measurements simultaneously obtained by quantitative Doppler echocardiography 4 weeks after creation of mitral regurgitation. The same procedure was performed in 11 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation and in 8 Beagle dogs under two different protocols of general anesthesia. ERO and regurgitant stroke volume (RSV) by the PISA method correlated well with values by the quantitative Doppler technique with a small error in experimental dogs (r = 0.914 and r = 0.839) and 11 patients (r = 0.990 and r = 0.996). The isoflurane anesthetic echocardiography demonstrated a significant decrease of RSV, and there was no significant change in fractional shortening (FS), ERO area, LV end-diastolic and LV end-systolic volume. ERO area showed increasing tendency after ketamine-xylazine administration, but not statistically significant. RSV, LV end-systolic and LV end-diastolic volume increased significantly (p < 0.01), whereas FS significantly decreased (p < 0.01). The PISA method is accurate and reproducible in experimental mitral regurgitation model and in a clinical setting. ERO area is considered and preferred as a hemodynamic-nondependent factor than other traditional measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2004) studied Mitral regurgitation (n=19). Proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method vs. Quantitative Doppler echocardiography was evaluated on Correlation of effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant stroke volume between PISA and quantitative Doppler. The PISA method accurately quantified effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant stroke volume in dogs with mitral regurgitation, correlating highly with quantitative Doppler (r=0.839-0.996).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: