Key result
PISA strongly correlates with pulsed Doppler for measuring severe mitral regurgitation volumes in dogs.
Why the study?
Accurate quantitative measurement of regurgitation rate in severe mitral valve regurgitation using the PISA method required evaluation and validation.
Does the PISA method correlate with the pulsed Doppler method for measuring regurgitation volumes in dogs with severe mitral valve insufficiency?
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Yes
Does the PISA method correlate with the pulsed Doppler method for measuring regurgitation volumes in dogs with severe mitral valve insufficiency?
Effect estimate: r=0.97
p-value: p=<0.01
The PISA method shows excellent correlation with the pulsed Doppler method for quantifying regurgitation volume in a canine model of severe mitral valve insufficiency.
Supports PISA validation in canine mitral regurgitation models; leaves open clinical translation in veterinary practice.
In 33 dogs with mitral valve insufficiency (MR), assessed as severe by semi-quantitative color flow Doppler echocardiography, regurgitation volumes were measured by the "Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area" (PISA) method. Good correlation (p<0.01, r=0.97) between the regurgitation volumes determined by the "PISA" and pulsed Doppler methods was confirmed. As evaluated by the "PISA" method, regurgitation rates in the 32 dogs with measurable regurgitation volumes ranged from 23 to 73%, with a mean of 51.6 +/- 11.8%. Regurgitation volumes ranged from 3.3 to 32 ml, with a mean of 8.4 +/- 6.4 ml.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doiguchi et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral valve insufficiency (n=33). Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) method vs. Pulsed Doppler method was evaluated on Correlation of regurgitation volumes between PISA and pulsed Doppler methods (r=0.97, p=<0.01). The PISA method demonstrated a strong correlation (r=0.97, p<0.01) with the pulsed Doppler method for measuring regurgitation volumes in dogs with severe mitral valve insufficiency.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: