This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
It is known that columnar defects comprised of self-organized BaZrO3(BZO) nanorods within REBa2Cu3Oy(REBCO) films are attractive asc-axis correlated pinning centers. On the other hand, we have fabricated high-JcSm1+xBa2-xCu3Oy(SmBCO) films including nanosized low-Tcphases by using the low-temperature growth (LTG) technique. In this study, BZO nanorods were added to the LTG-SmBCO film for a further enhancement of the magnetic flux pinning. Additionally, we also deposited a conventional PLD-SmBCO film including BZO nanorods and discussed differences of the flux pinning properties and microstructures between LTG- and PLD-SmBCO films. In a cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the BZO doped PLD-SmBCO film, we could see the self-organized BZO nanorods were about 10 nm in diameter, extending along thec-axis of the film. In contrast, in the BZO doped LTG-SmBCO film, the high density BZO nanorods with smaller diameters tended to be short columns and tilted against thec-axis direction. These facts can be attributed to a suppression of the surface diffusion length of adatoms and/or an increase of nucleation frequency due to the low substrate temperature during the growth of the BZO doped LTG-SmBCO film. Furthermore, we concluded that differences of superconducting properties between the BZO doped PLD- and LTG-SmBCO films might be attributed to the difference in the number density of BZO nanorods which generated lattice strain around them.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozaki et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: