Key result
Endovascular splanchnic nerve ablation safely reduces exercise PCWP at 1 month in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Splanchnic vasoconstriction increases hemodynamic congestion in HFpEF, and therapeutic interruption of splanchnic nerve activity holds promise to reduce congestion.
Does endovascular ablation of the right greater splanchnic nerve improve pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF?
RCT (n=116)
double-blinded
randomized
Yes
Does endovascular ablation of the right greater splanchnic nerve improve pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF?
Endovascular ablation of the right greater splanchnic nerve appears safe and may improve hemodynamics and clinical status in HFpEF, pending results of the randomized sham-controlled phase.
May support progression to sham-controlled testing in HFpEF; leaves open clinical outcome benefits.
OBJECTIVE: Splanchnic vasoconstriction augments transfer of blood volume from the abdomen into the thorax, which may increase filling pressures and hemodynamic congestion in patients with noncompliant hearts. Therapeutic interruption of splanchnic nerve activity holds promise to reduce hemodynamic congestion in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we describe (1) the rationale and design of the first sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial of splanchnic nerve ablation for HFpEF and (2) the 12-month results of the lead-in (open-label) trial's participants. METHODS: REBALANCE-HF is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial of endovascular, transcatheter, right-sided greater splanchnic nerve ablation for volume management (SAVM) in patients with HFpEF. The primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SAVM and identify responder characteristics to inform future studies. The trial consists of an open-label lead-in phase followed by the randomized, sham-controlled phase. The primary efficacy endpoint is the reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at 1-month follow-up compared to baseline during passive leg raise and 20W exercise. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), 6-minute walk test distance, New York Heart Association class, and NTproBNP levels at 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is device- or procedure-related serious adverse events at the 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: The lead-in phase of the study, which enrolled 26 patients with HFpEF who underwent SAVM, demonstrated favorable safety outcomes and reduction in exercise PCWP at 1 month post-procedure and improvements in all secondary endpoints at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. The randomized phase of the trial (n = 44 SAVM; n = 46 sham) has completed enrollment, and follow-up is ongoing. CONCLUSION: REBALANCE-HF is the first sham-controlled randomized clinical trial of greater splanchnic nerve ablation in HFpEF. Initial 12-month open-label results are promising, and the results of the randomized portion of the trial will inform the design of a future pivotal clinical trial. SAVM may offer a promising therapeutic option for patients with HFpEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04592445.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fudim et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=116). Endovascular ablation of the right greater splanchnic nerve vs. Sham was evaluated on Reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at 1-month follow-up compared to baseline during passive leg raise and 20W exercise. In the open-label lead-in phase (n=26), endovascular splanchnic nerve ablation demonstrated favorable safety and reduced exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at 1 month in patients with HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: