Why the study?
Characteristics associated with progression of BKPyV-DNAemia to unfavorable outcomes after reducing immunosuppression to manage BK viremia were not well elucidated.
What are the risk factors for progression to unfavorable outcomes after immunosuppressive reduction for BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=224)
No
What are the risk factors for progression to unfavorable outcomes after immunosuppressive reduction for BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients?
Hazard Ratio: 2.05 (95% CI 1.08–3.9)
p-value: p=0.02
Almost half of kidney transplant recipients with BK viremia managed by immunosuppressant reduction progress to unfavorable outcomes, with specific risk factors predicting either severe BK nephropathy or rejection.
May guide closer monitoring in females with prior rejection or delayed graft function; hypothesis-generating for tailored BK management in kidney transplant recipients.
BACKGROUNDS: copies/mL and BK nephropathy, and others may develop de novo DSA (dnDSA) or acute rejection (AR). METHODS: This was a single-center study of KTRs transplanted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2017. In this study, we sought to elucidate characteristics associated with the progression of BKPyV-DNAemia to unfavorable outcomes after decreasing immunosuppressive medications for the management of BK viremia as described in consensus guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 224 KTRs fulfilled our selection criteria; 118 (53%) resolved or had persistent low DNAemia, 64 (28%) had severe BK/nephropathy, and 42 (19%) developed dnDSA or AR. In multivariable analysis, female gender (HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.08-3.90; P = .02); previous rejection (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.04-8.12; P = .04), and early infection (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.90; P < .001) were associated with the development of severe BK/nephropathy. Conversely, non-depleting induction at transplant (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.03-4.11; P = .03), HLA mismatches >3 (HR: 2.27; HR: 1.01-5.06; P = .04), and delayed graft function (HR: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.12-15.28; P = .03) were associated with development of dnDSA and/or rejection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that almost half of KTRs with BKPyV-DNAemia managed by our immunosuppressant adjustment protocol progress unfavorably. Identification of these risk factors could assist the frontline clinician in creating an individualized immunosuppressive modification plan potentially mitigating negative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kharel et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in BKPyV-DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients (n=224). Risk factors (e.g., female gender, previous rejection, delayed graft function) vs. Absence of respective risk factors was evaluated on Development of severe BK/nephropathy (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.08-3.90, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: