Key result
Valve-sparing root replacement is linked to higher aortic reoperation risk in Loeys-Dietz versus Marfan syndrome.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the surgical outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique for annuloaortic ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome.
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement yield similar long-term durability in patients with Marfan syndrome compared to those with Loeys-Dietz syndrome?
Cohort (n=54)
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement yield similar long-term durability in patients with Marfan syndrome compared to those with Loeys-Dietz syndrome?
p-value: p=0.588
Valve-sparing root replacement offers durable aortic valve outcomes in both Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes, though Loeys-Dietz patients face a higher risk of subsequent distal aortic reoperations.
Supports valve-sparing root replacement for durability in both syndromes; leaves open tailored surveillance or thresholds for Loeys-Dietz reoperations.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of a valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique for annuloaortic ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and in those with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). METHODS: We reviewed 103 patients with MSF with mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene and 28 patients with LDS with mutations in the transforming growth factor-beta receptor and 2, SMAD3 and transforming growth factor beta-2 from 1988 to 2020. RESULTS: Forty-four (42.7%) patients with MFS [26 men, 31 (7.6) years] and 10 (35.7%) patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) [7 men, 22 (standard deviation: 8.6) years] who had no aortic dissection and underwent valve-sparing root replacement were included. The preoperative sinus diameter [46 (45-50.5) mm in those with MFS vs 48 (47-50) mm in those with LDS, p = 0.420] and the percentage of aortic insufficiency > grade 2+ [31.8% (10/44) in patients with MFS vs 10.0% (1/10) in those with LDS, p = 0.667] revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The cumulative incidences of aortic insufficiency greater than grade 1 (p = 0.588) and aortic valve reoperation (p = 0.310) were comparable between the 2 groups. Patients with LDS had a higher tendency towards aortic dissection after the initial operation (p = 0.061) and a significantly higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation (p = 0.003) versus those with MFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MFS and those with LDS showed similar cumulative incidences of recurrent aortic valve insufficiency and aortic valve reoperation. Those with LDS revealed a higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation and a greater tendency towards aortic dissection after the initial operation compared with those with MFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seike et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Annuloaortic ectasia in Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (n=54). Loeys-Dietz syndrome vs. Marfan syndrome was evaluated on Cumulative incidence of aortic insufficiency greater than grade 1 (p=0.588). Following valve-sparing root replacement, patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome had similar rates of recurrent aortic insufficiency but a significantly higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation (P=0.003) compared to those with Marfan syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: