Key result
BGcsSENet outperforms standard GRU modules in automated detection of LBBB, RBBB, and normal sinus rhythm.
Why the study?
Conventional diagnosis of LBBB and RBBB is strenuous and time-consuming because it relies heavily on visual observation of the electrocardiogram.
Does the BGcsSENet model improve the automated detection of LBBB, RBBB, and normal sinus rhythm compared to standard GRU and B-GRU models?
Does the BGcsSENet model improve the automated detection of LBBB, RBBB, and normal sinus rhythm compared to standard GRU and B-GRU models?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The novel BGcsSENet deep learning architecture improves automated detection of bundle branch blocks from ECGs, showing potential for deployment on lightweight devices.
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB) are the common but neglected arrhythmias clinically. However, the conventional LBBB and RBBB diagnosis methods are strenuous and time-consuming because this process relies heavily on the physician's visual observation of electrocardiogram. In this article, we developed a novel network module based on the existing bidirectional gated recurrent unit (B-GRU) network for automated LBBB, RBBB, and normal sinus rhythm detection. Inspired from spatial and channel squeeze-excitation network (scSENet), the proposed module is capable of effectively recalibrating feature representation in B-GRU using both channel squeeze-excitation and spatial squeeze-excitation modules along channel and space to emphasize useful features while suppressing weak ones, namely, BGcsSENet. To further verify its effectiveness, we leverage the standard GRU and B-GRU modules as control models across the two public databases. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of BGcsSENet, while yielding better performance than existing GRU, B-GRU modules, and many published approaches. Particularly, our BGcsSENet model is the first research to refine the network architecture of B-GRU, thus demonstrating considerable application potential on lightweight devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jibin Wang (2023) studied Left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and normal sinus rhythm. BGcsSENet (Bidirectional GRU With Spatial and Channel Squeeze-Excitation Network) vs. Standard GRU and B-GRU modules was evaluated on Automated LBBB, RBBB, and normal sinus rhythm detection performance. The BGcsSENet model yielded better performance than standard GRU and B-GRU modules for automated detection of left and right bundle branch blocks and normal sinus rhythm.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: