Key result
Index NSTEMI revascularization is linked to a ~41% lower risk of 90-day MACE readmission.
Why the study?
Studies on readmissions following NSTEMI are limited, prompting an investigation into readmission rates, causes, and the impact of coronary revascularization.
Does coronary revascularization reduce 90-day readmissions for MACE in adults hospitalized for NSTEMI?
Cohort (n=296,965)
Yes
Does coronary revascularization reduce 90-day readmissions for MACE in adults hospitalized for NSTEMI?
Hazard Ratio: 0.59 (95% CI 0.56–0.63)
p-value: p=< .001
Coronary revascularization during index hospitalization for NSTEMI is associated with a significantly lower risk of 90-day readmission for MACE and any cause.
Supports revascularization during NSTEMI index admission to lower 90-day MACE readmissions; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the causes and predictors of readmission after NSTEMI. BACKGROUND: Studies on readmissions following non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are limited. We investigated the rate and causes for readmission and the impact of coronary revascularization on 90-day readmissions following a hospitalization for NSTEMI in a large, nationally representative United States database. METHODS: We queried the National Readmission Database for the year 2016 using appropriate ICD-10-CM/PCS codes to identify all adult admissions for NSTEMI. We determined the 90-day readmissions for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). All-cause readmission was a secondary endpoint. The association between coronary revascularization and the likelihood of readmission was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 296,965 adult discharges following an admission for NSTEMI were included in this study. The rate of readmissions for MACE was 5.2% (n = 15,637) and for any cause was 18.0% (n = 53,316). 38% of MACE readmissions and 40% of all-cause readmissions occurred between 30- and 90-days following the index hospitalization. During index hospitalization, 51.0% underwent coronary revascularization (40.8% with PCI and 10.2% with CABG). This was independently predictive of a lower risk of 90-day readmission for MACE (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.63, p < .001) and for any cause (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.63-0.67, p < .001). In-hospital mortality for MACE readmissions was significantly higher compared to that of index hospitalization (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Readmissions following NSTEMI carry higher mortality than the index hospitalization. Coronary revascularization for NSTEMI is associated with a lower readmission rate at 90 days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sreenivasan et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=296,965). Coronary revascularization vs. No coronary revascularization was evaluated on 90-day readmission for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.63, p=< .001). Coronary revascularization during index hospitalization for NSTEMI was associated with a lower risk of 90-day readmission for MACE (adjusted HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.56-0.63; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: