Key result
SMA blood flow and pulsatility index measurements show high interobserver reproducibility.
Why the study?
The relationships between superior mesenteric artery blood flow and pulsatility index during rest and constrictor stimuli in normal subjects were not well characterized.
Are superior mesenteric artery blood flow and pulsatility index measurements reproducible and correlated at rest and during constrictor stimuli in normal subjects?
Observational (n=25)
Are superior mesenteric artery blood flow and pulsatility index measurements reproducible and correlated at rest and during constrictor stimuli in normal subjects?
Both PI and SMABF measurements are reproducible and can monitor physiological changes in the superior mesenteric artery, though PI should not be used during postural changes.
Supports SMA flow/PI use in mesenteric research protocols; leaves open validation for clinical monitoring in patients.
The relationships between superior mesenteric artery blood flow (SMABF) and pulsatility index (PI) measurement during rest (25 subjects) and stimuli constricting the SMA (16 subjects) have been studied in normal subjects. At rest and during constrictor stimuli, SMABF and PI were highly reproducible (r = 0.89, p < 0.01 for SMABF, and r = 0.97, p < 0.001 for PI) between two observers. There was significant correlation between changes in SMABF, PI, and SMA vascular resistance during the constrictor stimuli, except during head-up tilt when PI was unchanged. Both PI and SMABF measurements are reproducible and can be used to monitor physiological changes in suitable (18 of 25) subjects. PI measurement, although semiquantitative, by itself can also be used to monitor these changes. This may be also of importance in pathological situations such as intestinal ischemia, where measurement of volume blood flow may be less accurate due to irregularities of the vessel wall. PI measurement, however, ideally should not be used in studies involving postural change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhuri et al. (1994) conducted an observational in Normal subjects (n=25). Constrictor stimuli vs. Rest was evaluated on Reproducibility of superior mesenteric artery blood flow (SMABF) and pulsatility index (PI) between two observers (r = 0.89 for SMABF; r = 0.97 for PI, p=<0.01 for SMABF; <0.001 for PI). Superior mesenteric artery blood flow and pulsatility index measurements were highly reproducible between two observers (r=0.89, p<0.01 for SMABF; r=0.97, p<0.001 for PI).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: