Key result
CCTA establishes SCAD diagnosis by identifying intramural hematoma in initially nonobstructive coronary arteries.
Why the study?
SCAD is a rare cause of ACS that remains underdiagnosed despite technological advances in invasive and non-invasive imaging tests.
Case Report (n=1)
CCTA can be a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying spontaneous coronary artery dissection in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome without obstructive lesions on invasive angiography.
CCTA may aid SCAD diagnosis when angiography is nondiagnostic; leaves open its broader role pending prospective studies.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), defined as separation of the layers of the coronary wall unrelated to trauma, iatrogenesis, or atherosclerosis, often occurs in young women without cardiovascular risk factors.1 First described almost a century ago, it was poorly understood for some time, known only to be associated with the peripartum and pregnancy periods.2 SCAD is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and despite technological advances in invasive or non-invasive imaging tests increasing our understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment, it remains underdiagnosed.1,3 This report describes the case of an ACS patient without obstructive lesions on coronary angiography in which coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was an indispensable tool in the diagnosis of SCAD with an unusual location, highlighting its growing importance based on the current scientific literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brida et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) (n=1). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. Invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Coronary computed tomography angiography successfully identified an intramural hematoma, establishing the diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a patient with initially nonobstructive coronary arteries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: