Key result
Normalized lifting wavelet transform improves ECG compression ratio over Slantlet transform and unnormalized LWT.
Why the study?
The performance of Slantlet transform, lifting wavelet transform, and lifting wavelet transform with normalisation for ECG compression was analysed to identify the most effective method.
Lifting wavelet transform with normalisation improves ECG signal compression ratios compared to Slantlet transform and unnormalised LWT.
This article analyses the performance of: (i) linear transform: Slantlet transform (SLT), (ii) nonlinear transform: lifting wavelet transform (LWT) and (iii) nonlinear transform (LWT) with normalisation for electrocardiogram (ECG) compression. First, an ECG signal is transformed using linear transform and nonlinear transform. The transformed coefficients (TC) are then thresholded using bisection algorithm in order to match the predefined user-specified percentage root mean square difference (UPRD) within the tolerance. Then, the binary look up table is made to store the position map for zero and nonzero coefficients (NZCs). The NZCs are quantised by Max–Lloyd quantiser followed by Arithmetic coding. The look up table is encoded by Huffman coding. The results show that the LWT gives the best result as compared to SLT evaluated in this article. This transform is then considered to evaluate the effect of normalisation before thresholding. In case of normalisation, the TC is normalised by dividing the TC by (where is number of samples) to reduce the range of TC. The normalised coefficients (NC) are then thresholded. After that the procedure is same as in case of coefficients without normalisation. The results show that the compression ratio (CR) in case of LWT with normalisation is improved as compared to that without normalisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aggarwal et al. (2012) studied electrocardiogram (ECG) compression. Lifting wavelet transform (LWT) with normalisation vs. Slantlet transform (SLT) and LWT without normalisation was evaluated on Compression ratio (CR). Lifting wavelet transform with normalisation improved the compression ratio for ECG signals compared to Slantlet transform and LWT without normalisation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: