Key result
Controlled hemorrhage induces a ~36-fold increase in drinking over basal levels in marine elasmobranch fish.
Why the study?
The physiological mechanisms underlying drinking rate responses to osmotic and volaemic changes in marine elasmobranch fish were not fully understood.
Hypovolaemia induces a physiological dipsogenesis (drinking response) in marine elasmobranch fish as part of their osmoregulatory strategy.
An increase in drinking rate of two species of marine elasmobranch fish, Scyliorhinus canicula and Triakis scyllia, acclimated to 80 % sea water was observed following the introduction of 100 % sea water to experimental tanks. The drinking response in both species was found to be maximal within 6 h, and a significant increase was sustained for up to 24 h in T. scyllia. Plasma osmolality was significantly increased within 6 h following introduction of 100 % sea water, and this increase was principally due to elevated plasma Na(+) and Cl(-) concentrations. Administration of 2 mol l(-1) mannitol, 75 % sucrose and vehicle (elasmobranch Ringer) did not induce a significant increase or decrease in the drinking rate of S. canicula. However, injection of 20 % NaCl was found to decrease drinking rate significantly in S. canicula 60 min after administration. Controlled haemorrhage of approximately 5.7 % of total blood volume in S. canicula induced a rapid 36-fold increase in drinking over basal levels. The present study demonstrates a physiological dipsogenesis in response to hypovolaemia in marine elasmobranch fish as part of their overall iso/hyperosmoregulatory strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2002) studied Osmotic stress and hypovolaemia in marine elasmobranch fish. 100% sea water exposure and controlled haemorrhage vs. 80% sea water and basal levels was evaluated on Drinking rate. Controlled haemorrhage of approximately 5.7% of total blood volume induced a rapid 36-fold increase in drinking over basal levels in marine elasmobranch fish.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: