Key result
Multi-Link Frontier stent proximal diameter measures ~0.5 mm smaller in human autopsy versus porcine hearts.
Why the study?
Does the Multi-Link Frontier coronary bifurcation stent expand differently in human autopsy hearts compared to porcine hearts and manufacturer specifications?
Does the Multi-Link Frontier coronary bifurcation stent expand differently in human autopsy hearts compared to porcine hearts and manufacturer specifications?
Micro-CT assessment reveals that the Multi-Link Frontier bifurcation stent achieves significantly smaller proximal expansion in human autopsy hearts with CAD compared to porcine models and manufacturer specifications, highlighting the need for intravascular imaging optimization during deployment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human autopsy results question porcine model applicability for bifurcation stents; hypothesis-generating for imaging optimization in deployment.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging, beyond the introduction of drug eluting stents. Dedicated stent systems are available to improve the technical approach to the treatment of these lesions. However dedicated stent systems have so far not reduced the incidence of stent restenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the expansion of the Multi-Link (ML) Frontier™ stent in human and porcine coronary arteries to provide the cardiologist with useful in-vitro information for stent implantation and selection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Nine ML Frontier™ stents were implanted in seven human autopsy heart samples with known coronary artery disease and five ML Frontier™ stents were implanted in five porcine hearts. Proximal, distal and side branch diameters (PD, DD, SBD, respectively), corresponding opening areas (PA, DA, SBA) and the mean stent length (L) were assessed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). PD and PA were significantly smaller in human autopsy heart samples than in porcine heart samples (3.54±0.47 mm vs. 4.04±0.22 mm, p = 0.048; 10.00±2.42 mm(2) vs. 12.84±1.38 mm(2), p = 0.034, respectively) and than those given by the manufacturer (3.54±0.47 mm vs. 4.03 mm, p = 0.014). L was smaller in human autopsy heart samples than in porcine heart samples, although data did not reach significance (16.66±1.30 mm vs. 17.30±0.51 mm, p = 0.32), and significantly smaller than that given by the manufacturer (16.66±1.30 mm vs. 18 mm, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Micro-CT is a feasible tool for exact surveying of dedicated stent systems and could make a contribution to the development of these devices. The proximal diameter and proximal area of the stent system were considerably smaller in human autopsy heart samples than in porcine heart samples and than those given by the manufacturer. Special consideration should be given to the stent deployment procedure (and to the follow-up) of dedicated stent systems, considering final intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography to visualize (and if necessary optimize) stent expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kralev et al. (2011) studied Coronary bifurcation lesions (n=12). Multi-Link Frontier Coronary Bifurcation Stent vs. Porcine heart samples and manufacturer compliance chart was evaluated on Proximal stent diameter (PD) (p=0.048). The proximal diameter of the Multi-Link Frontier stent was significantly smaller in human autopsy heart samples compared to porcine heart samples (3.54 mm vs. 4.04 mm, p=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: