Key result
Severe frailty is linked to ~25% lower initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether frailty influences the initiation of cardioprotective diabetes drug therapies (SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Does frailty reduce the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=103,790)
Yes
Does frailty reduce the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease?
Hazard Ratio: 0.75 (95% CI 0.7–0.8)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Frail patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease are significantly less likely to be prescribed cardioprotective SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists compared to non-frail patients.
Severe frailty linked to lower SGLT2i/GLP-1RA initiation; hypothesis-generating for prescribing equity and needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Whether frailty influences the initiation of two cardioprotective diabetes drug therapies (ie, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease is unknown. We aimed to assess rates of initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists according to frailty in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: For this cross-sectional, nationwide study, all people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in Denmark between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2021, from six Danish health-data registers were identified. People younger than 40 years, with end-stage renal disease, with registered contraindications to SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists, or with previous use of either drug therapy were excluded. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score was used to categorise people as either non-frail, moderately frail, or severely frail. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the association between frailty and initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist. FINDINGS: Of 119 390 people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, 103 790 were included. Median follow-up time was 4·5 years (IQR 2·7-6·1) and median age across the three frailty groups was 71 years (64-79). 65 959 (63·6%) of 103 790 people were male and 37 831 (36·5%) were female. At index date, 66 910 (64·5%) people were non-frail, 29 250 (28·2%) were moderately frail, and 7630 (7·4%) were severely frail. Frailty was associated with a significantly lower probability of initiating therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist than in people who were non-frail (moderately frail hazard ratio 0·91, 95% CI 0·88-0·94, p<0·0001; severely frail 0·75, 0·70-0·80, p<0·0001). This association persisted after adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, year of inclusion, duration of type 2 diabetes, duration of cardiovascular disease, polypharmacy, and comorbidity. INTERPRETATION: In people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in Denmark, frailty was associated with a significantly lower probability of SGLT2-inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor-agonist initiation, despite their benefits. Formulating clear and updated guidelines on the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in people who are frail with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease should be a priority. FUNDING: Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital. TRANSLATION: For the Danish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malik et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (n=103,790). Frailty vs. Non-frail was evaluated on Initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.80, p=<0.0001). Severe frailty was associated with a significantly lower probability of initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist compared to being non-frail (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.70-0.80; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: