Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Over the last few decades, non-operative management (NOM) has become increasingly popular, especially for low-grade (I-III) blunt renal injuries.The published evidence is unclear about the role of NOM for higher grades (IV and V).We took up this study to report our short and long-term outcomes following initial nonoperative management in patients sustaining a grade 5 renal injury secondary to blunt trauma. Materials and Methods:The charts of all patients who presented to our institution with blunt renal trauma between Jan 2000 and Dec 2014 and had grade V renal injury were identifi ed and analyzed.Results: 114 patients were identifi ed, with grade V renal injury following blunt trauma (BRI).9/114 patients (7.89%) died following resuscitation in the casualty and emergency services, 4 (3.50%) of whom had deaths that were related to the kidney injury.36 (34.28%) underwent early surgical exploration (13 -42 hours) for various indications and nephrectomy was performed in 21 (58.33%).Eight patients who were on non-operative management needed delayed surgical exploration of which two patients (25%) presenting with massive secondary bleeding needed nephrectomy for control of the bleeding.Conclusions: 41.9% of patients with grade V renal injury needed surgical exploration of which 34.28% underwent early, whereas 7.61% underwent delayed exploration.58.33% of patients undergoing early exploration and 25% of patients undergoing delayed exploration ended up with nephrectomy.Non operative management would be safe in the majority of patients with grade V renal injuries secondary to blunt trauma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajendra et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: