Key result
Dual-tDCS improves MoCA scores by ~3 points over sham in post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Why the study?
The clinical efficacy of dual transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment and its effects on hierarchical functional brain network organization were unclear.
Does bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dual-tDCS improve global cognitive function (MoCA) and modulate functional brain network organization compared to sham stimulation in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment?
RCT (n=74)
Double-blind, sham-controlled
1:1 randomization using a computer-generated sequence
No
Does bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dual-tDCS improve global cognitive function (MoCA) and modulate functional brain network organization compared to sham stimulation in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bilateral DLPFC dual-tDCS safely enhances global cognitive recovery and activities of daily living in post-stroke cognitive impairment, with improvements linked to hierarchical reorganization of resting-state functional brain networks.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and to explore the effects on the hierarchical organization of functional brain networks, ranging from regional synchronization to inter-regional connectivity and global network topology. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, 74 PSCI patients received conventional therapy alongside either active dual-tDCS (n = 38) or sham stimulation (n = 36). Active tDCS targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) via anodal-left/cathodal-right nodes (2.0 mA, 20 min/day, 20 sessions). The primary outcome was the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes included the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Stroop Test (ST), Trail Making Test (TMT), Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS), and Barthel Index (BI). A subgroup of 36 participants (18 per group) underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to analyze regional homogeneity (ReHo), functional connectivity (FC), and network topology. Partial correlations assessed the association between neuroimaging alterations and clinical improvements. RESULTS: The tDCS group showed significantly greater improvements in MoCA scores (tDCS: 5.74 ± 2.76 vs. sham: 2.69 ± 2.69; t = 4.799, p < 0.001) as well as in attention and memory domains compared to the sham group. The rs-fMRI changes included increased ReHo in the right middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and reduced FC between the right MTG-left superior frontal gyrus and left IFG-cerebellum (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Additionally, small-worldness and global efficiency increased (p < 0.05) with these alterations correlating with clinical recovery. Adverse events were rare and self-limiting. CONCLUSION: Dual-tDCS over bilateral DLPFC safely improves cognitive recovery in PSCI. These clinical gains are associated with rs-fMRI alterations, specifically in regional synchronization, inter-regional connectivity, and global topology, which suggest a potential biomarker for monitoring tDCS efficacy, offering a rationale for precision neuromodulation in stroke rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) (n=74). Dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (anodal-left F3 / cathodal-right F4) vs. Sham stimulation (identical electrode placement, current ramped down after 30 s) alongside conventional therapy and standard medication was evaluated on Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score (p=<0.001). Dual-tDCS over the bilateral DLPFC improved MoCA scores compared to sham stimulation in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: