Key result
Pericardial window treats a 48-hour delayed presentation of penetrating cardiac injury with haemopericardium.
Why the study?
Management strategies for penetrating cardiac injury presenting after a delay are not well defined.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Penetrating cardiac injuries can present with delayed symptoms and require prompt multimodality imaging and surgical intervention.
Delayed presentation after penetrating cardiac injury warrants vigilance; this single case leaves open optimal timing and protocols.
A 34 year old male sustained a stab injury to his left parasternal edge at the 4th intercostal space. Following a delay of 48 h, he presented to his local secondary hospital. At the time of admission he had a blood pressure of 73/38 mmHg – no other clinical signs of cardiac tamponade – and this normalised with intravenous fluids. Basic x-rays were performed and computed tomography (CT) of his chest was undertaken. This demonstrated a haemopericardium with left sided haemothorax (Fig. 1). Following, the patient was urgently transferred to our Level 1 Trauma Unit. On arrival, vitals were normal. Arterial blood gas results were pH 7.44, lactate 0.4 mmol/L and base excess 7.3 mmol/L. Electrocardiogram demonstrated T wave flattening at lead 3 and ST elevation at V3. Retrospective analysis of his chest X-rays from the secondary hospital revealed straightening of the left heart border, highly suspicious of haemopericardium. Transthoracic echocardiography was also performed and confirmed pericardial effusion. Troponin was elevated at 1.1 mg/L. The patient was taken to the operating theatre. A pericardial window was initially performed which demonstrated
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Profyris et al. (2011) conducted a case report in Penetrating cardiac injury (n=1). Pericardial window was evaluated. A 34-year-old male with a penetrating cardiac injury presented 48 hours post-stab wound and was managed with a pericardial window after imaging confirmed haemopericardium.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: