Key result
Ross procedure demonstrates 0% early mortality and reduced LV diastolic diameter in aortic valve disease.
Why the study?
Does the Ross procedure provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with aortic valve disease?
Observational (n=42)
No
Does the Ross procedure provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with aortic valve disease?
The Ross procedure is a safe and effective surgical option for aortic valve disease, providing excellent early and mid-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes.
Single-center Ross series supports feasibility in selected young patients; leaves open durability and reintervention rates in broader populations.
BACKGROUND: Aortic root replacement with pulmonary autograft (Ross procedure) has the advantages of good haemodynamics and growth potential without the need for anticoagulation. In this study, we reviewed our experience of the Ross procedure for patients with aortic valve disease. METHODS: From October 1994 to January 2005, 42 Ross procedures were performed in our centre. There were 30 males and 12 females. The mean age was 28 +/- 15 years (range, 5-56 years). Congenital heart disease (CHD) with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and/or aortic valve insufficiency (AI) in 40 cases including one associated with ventricular septal defect (VSD), degenerated aortic valve disease with AS in 1 and subacutive bacterial endocarditis (SBE) with AI in 1 were studied. The diagnosis was made by ultracardiography (UCG) in all patients. The mean aortic valve annulus diameter (AVD) was (2.45 +/- 0.31) cm and pulmonary valve annulus diameter (MPVD) was (2.34 +/- 0.21) cm. All patients had normal pulmonary valves. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class was II in 36 cases and III in 6 cases. The operation was performed under moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with aortic root replacement using pulmonary autograft and pulmonary valve replacement with a homograft. RESULTS: There was no early hospital mortality. Postoperative UCG showed normal aortic valve function in all our patients. The mean gradient across the aortic valve was (6.11 +/- 0.12) mmHg. The left ventricular diastole diameter (LVDD) decreased significantly from (62 +/- 5) mm to (56 +/- 3) mm (P < 0.001). The mean postoperative left ventricular ejective fraction (LVEF) was 0.49 +/- 0.23. All patients were in NYHA class I-II. Follow-up was completed in 38 cases for a mean period of 3.2 years (range 1-10 years). All survivors were in NYHA class I with normal neo-aortic and pulmonary valve function. One patient died after secondary operation due to homograft fungal endocarditis 1 year after the Ross procedure. The cause of death was uncontrolled bleeding. Another patient suffered from cardiogenic shock and was on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for 10 days postoperatively. This patient was subsequently self-discharged from hospital due to financial issues and he was excluded from follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure is an excellent technique to treat aortic valve disease. Our data show that it can be performed safely with good early and mid-term clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Aortic valve disease (n=42). Ross procedure (pulmonary autograft transplantation) was evaluated on Early hospital mortality. The Ross procedure for aortic valve disease was performed with 0% early hospital mortality and significantly decreased left ventricular diastole diameter from 62 mm to 56 mm (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: