Key result
Imaging photoplethysmography allowed accurate non-contact estimation of pulse rate from facial videos in rhesus monkeys, with an estimation error below 5% for 82% of all epochs compared to a reference pulse-oximeter.
Why the study?
There is no established simple and non-invasive technique for pulse rate measurements in awake and behaving non-human primates.
Does imaging photoplethysmography accurately estimate pulse rate in awake rhesus monkeys compared to a pulse-oximeter?
Does imaging photoplethysmography accurately estimate pulse rate in awake rhesus monkeys compared to a pulse-oximeter?
Imaging photoplethysmography provides a non-invasive, non-contact method for accurate pulse rate estimation in awake non-human primates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
iPPG enables accurate non-contact pulse rate estimation in head-stabilized rhesus monkeys; leaves open validation for unrestrained animals and broader primate applications.
For humans and for non-human primates heart rate is a reliable indicator of an individual’s current physiological state, with applications ranging from health checks to experimental studies of cognitive and emotional state. In humans, changes in the optical properties of the skin tissue correlated with cardiac cycles (imaging photoplethysmogram, iPPG) allow non-contact estimation of heart rate by its proxy, pulse rate. Yet, there is no established simple and non-invasive technique for pulse rate measurements in awake and behaving animals. Using iPPG, we here demonstrate that pulse rate in rhesus monkeys can be accurately estimated from facial videos. We computed iPPGs from seven color facial videos of three awake head-stabilized rhesus monkeys. Pulse rate estimated from iPPGs was in good agreement with reference data from a pulse-oximeter with error of pulse rate estimation below 5% for 82% of all epochs, and below 10% for 98% of the epochs. We conclude that iPPG allows non-invasive and non-contact estimation of pulse rate in non-human primates, which is useful for physiological studies and can be used toward welfare-assessment of non-human primates in research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unakafov et al. (2018) studied Heart rate estimation in non-human primates (n=3). Imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG) vs. Pulse-oximeter (reference) was evaluated on Pulse rate estimation error compared to reference pulse-oximeter. Imaging photoplethysmography allowed accurate non-contact estimation of pulse rate from facial videos in rhesus monkeys, with an estimation error below 5% for 82% of all epochs compared to a reference pulse-oximeter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: