Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The by-products of seven different cereal grains were investigated as a source of extractable oil, rich in lipophilic bioactive compounds. RESULTS: Oil yields (g kg(-1) DW) recovered from cereal by-products were as follows: 189 (rice bran) > 112 (wheat germ) > 74 (corn bran) > 58 (oat bran) > 41 (buckwheat bran) > 39 (spelt bran) > 33 (wheat bran) > 27 (rye bran). The main fatty acids identified in the studied oil samples were palmitic acid (11.39-17.23%), oleic acid (11.76-42.73%), linoleic acid (35.54-62.65%) and α-linolenic acid (1.05-9.46%). The range of total tocochromanols and phytosterols in the obtained oils was 0.369-3.763 and 1.19-35.24 g kg(-1) of oil, respectively. The oils recovered from buckwheat and corn bran, and wheat germ were dominated by tocopherols (99.9, 84.2 and 96.5%, respectively), whereas the oat, rice, rye, spelt, wheat bran oils were rich in tocotrienols (73.9, 79.6, 78.1, 90.6 and 73.8%, respectively). The campesterol and β-sitosterol constituted 10.1-32.5 and 30.4-63.7%, respectively, of total phytosterols contents identified in all of the studied samples. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that oils recovered from the cereal by-products are richer sources of bioactive compounds, compared with traditional oils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Górnaś et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: