Key result
Rosiglitazone linked to higher cardiovascular risk than pioglitazone despite similar glycemic control in T2D.
Why the study?
What are the cardiovascular safety profiles and risks associated with PPARgamma agonists (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) in type 2 diabetic patients?
What are the cardiovascular safety profiles and risks associated with PPARgamma agonists (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) in type 2 diabetic patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the divergent cardiovascular safety profiles of PPARgamma agonists, emphasizing the increased cardiovascular risk associated with rosiglitazone compared to pioglitazone.
Peroxisome proliferator-activator receptors (PPARs) are now known as members of the nuclear hormonereceptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate gene expression in response to nutritional and physiological stimuli. PPARγ plays a crucial role in glucose homeostasis and it is involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation and function. From all the PAARγ ligands, the thiazolidindiones (TZDs) are of most clinical importance. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone have been largely used so far in the clinical practice. They provide similar effects on glycemic control, as well as a range of similar adverse effects, such as weight gain, fluid retention, and increased risk of hearth failure, which seem to be PPARγ mediated. Interestingly, they differ on their effect on lipid and cardiovascular safety profile, indicating a PPARγ-independent mechanism. Indeed, rosiglitazone was recently withdrawn in Europe and its use has been restricted in USA as a consequence of increased risk of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. This review is focused on the cardiovascular effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone as representative members of PPARγ ligands, because they were widely evaluated in many clinical trials and experimental studies and data obtained from these studies are relevant from medicinal chemistry and clinical pharmacology point of view. Finally, an overview on the development of selective PPARγ modulators and/or dual PPARα/γ agonists will be given. These new approaches might provide anti-hyperglycemic efficacy without the associated undesirable side-effects. However, further experimental and clinical studies evaluating the theoretical benefit and safety of this therapeutic strategy are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciudin et al. (2012) conducted a review in Type 2 diabetes. PPARgamma Agonists (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) was evaluated. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone provide similar glycemic control but differ in cardiovascular safety, with rosiglitazone linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: