Why the study?
What are the safety profiles and future prospects of PPAR agonists in treating dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes?
What are the safety profiles and future prospects of PPAR agonists in treating dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes?
The review highlights the safety concerns of first-generation PPAR agonists and the potential of new dual PPAR-targeted therapies to improve safety while retaining efficacy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review of PPAR agonist safety profiles informs next-generation development; leaves open direct comparative trials.
INTRODUCTION: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α and -γ agonists, fibrates and glitazones, are effective treatments for dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus, respectively, but exhibit class-related, as well as compound-specific safety characteristics. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the profiles of PPAR-α, PPAR-γ, and dual PPAR-α/γ agonists with regard to class-related and compound-specific efficacy and adverse effects. We explore how learnings from first-generation drugs are being applied to develop safer PPAR-targeted therapies. EXPERT OPINION: The finding that rosiglitazone may increase risk for cardiovascular events has led to regulatory guidelines requiring demonstration of cardiovascular safety in appropriate outcome trials for new type 2 diabetes mellitus drugs. The emerging data on the possibly increased risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone may prompt the need for post-approval safety studies for new drugs. Since PPAR-α and -γ affect key cardiometabolic risk factors (diabetic dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and inflammation) in a complementary fashion, combining their benefits has emerged as a particularly attractive option. New PPAR-targeted therapies that balance the relative potency and/or activity toward PPAR-α and -γ have shown promise in retaining efficacy while reducing potential side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bortolini et al. (2012) conducted a review in Dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. PPAR agonists (PPAR-alpha, PPAR-gamma, and dual agonists) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: