Key result
Dual chamber pacemaker implantation linked to a ~10% decrease in GLS at three months.
Why the study?
Does dual chamber pacemaker implantation affect left ventricular longitudinal function and synchrony in patients with conventional indications?
Cohort (n=98)
Does dual chamber pacemaker implantation affect left ventricular longitudinal function and synchrony in patients with conventional indications?
Absolute Event Rate: -13.56% vs -15.08%
p-value: p=<0.05
Dual chamber pacemaker implantation leads to early impairment of global longitudinal strain and significant LV dyssynchrony detectable by speckle tracking echocardiography at 3 months.
Speckle tracking may detect subclinical LV impairment after dual-chamber pacing; leaves open whether lead optimization mitigates dyssynchrony.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate left ventricular (LV) longitudinal function and dyssynchrony mechanisms after dual chamber pacemaker implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The speckle tracking imaging technique was used for quantification of global longitudinal function of the left ventricle and for dyssynchrony evaluation before pacemaker implantation and after 3-month follow-up. The study group consisted of 98 patients with conventional indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: Speckle tracking echocardiographic methods and image postprocessing revealed impairment of global longitudinal strain and significant LV dyssynchrony derived from 12 basal and mid-septum segments usually untraceable with conventional echocardiographic methods. Despite good physical performance and ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain significantly decreased in all patients from -15.08±0.46 to -13.56±0.5 (P<0.05) as well as mitral annulus movement decreased from 11.57±2.41 to 8.46±1.74cm/s (P<0.001) and from 12.55±2.75 to 10.78±2.82mm (P<0.001). It was expected that patients with dual chamber pacemaker will develop inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony, but our study showed that pacing lead position did not prevent from LV dysynchronisation and only changed the mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Global longitudinal strain and LV dyssynchrony assessment enables us to detect early signs of LV dysfunction. Mechanisms of dyssynchrony development will be useful for pacemaker programing choices in order to prevent further dyssynchronisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baronaitė-Dūdonienė et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Conventional indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation (n=98). Dual chamber pacemaker implantation vs. Before pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (p=<0.05). Dual chamber pacemaker implantation significantly decreased global longitudinal strain from -15.08 to -13.56 (P<0.05) at 3-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: