Key result
G-CSF fails to influence myoblast proliferation or differentiation, suggesting in vivo effects require other cytokines.
Why the study?
Comprehensive characterization of G-CSFR expression in healthy and diseased skeletal muscle was lacking before implementing G-CSF as a therapeutic agent for skeletal muscle conditions.
G-CSF does not directly influence C2C12 myogenesis in vitro, suggesting its in vivo effects on skeletal muscle recovery may require interaction with other factors.
G-CSF shows no direct myogenic effects in vitro despite receptor presence; leaves open functional relevance in vivo and clinical translation.
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases recovery of rodent skeletal muscles after injury, and increases muscle function in rodent models of neuromuscular disease. However, the mechanisms by which G-CSF mediates these effects are poorly understood. G-CSF acts by binding to the membrane spanning G-CSFR and activating multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Expression of the G-CSFR within the haematopoietic system is well known, but more recently it has been demonstrated to be expressed in other tissues. However, comprehensive characterization of G-CSFR expression in healthy and diseased skeletal muscle, imperative before implementing G-CSF as a therapeutic agent for skeletal muscle conditions, has been lacking. Here we show that the G-CSFR is expressed in proliferating C2C12 myoblasts, differentiated C2C12 myotubes, human primary skeletal muscle cell cultures and in mouse and human skeletal muscle. In mdx mice, a model of human Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), G-CSF mRNA and protein was down-regulated in limb and diaphragm muscle, but circulating G-CSF ligand levels were elevated. G-CSFR mRNA in the muscles of mdx mice was up-regulated however steady-state levels of the protein were down-regulated. We show that G-CSF does not influence C2C12 myoblast proliferation, differentiation or phosphorylation of Akt, STAT3, and Erk1/2. Media change alone was sufficient to elicit increases in Akt, STAT3, and Erk1/2 phosphorylation in C2C12 muscle cells and suggest previous observations showing a G-CSF increase in phosphoprotein signaling be viewed with caution. These results suggest that the actions of G-CSF may require the interaction with other cytokines and growth factors in vivo, however these data provides preliminary evidence supporting the investigation of G-CSF for the management of muscular dystrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (2014) studied Duchenne muscular dystrophy (mdx model) and healthy skeletal muscle. G-CSF vs. Vehicle control or media change alone was evaluated on Myoblast proliferation, differentiation, and intracellular signaling (Akt, STAT3, Erk1/2 phosphorylation). G-CSF does not influence C2C12 myoblast proliferation, differentiation, or phosphorylation of Akt, STAT3, and Erk1/2, suggesting its in vivo effects may require interaction with other cytokines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: