Key result
Glycoprotein and PB1 polymerase segments reassort most frequently in swine influenza viruses.
Why the study?
Pigs are hypothesized to be the mixing vessel for reassortant influenza strains causing human pandemics, but detailed reassortment patterns in swine viruses need further study.
Statistical analysis of swine influenza viruses confirms that glycoprotein coding segments and the PB1 polymerase segment reassort frequently, supporting the role of pigs as mixing vessels for pandemic strains.
Challenges long-held mixing vessel hypothesis for 1918–1968 pandemics; leaves open swine's role in future emergence.
Previous human influenza pandemics were the results of emerging viruses from non-human reservoirs, with at least two caused by strains of mixed human and avian origin. Also, many cases of swine influenza viruses have reportedly infected humans, including the recent human H1N1 strain, isolated in Mexico and the United States. Pigs are documented to get infected with human, avian, and swine viruses and allow productive replication, thus it has been conjectured that they are the "mixing vessel" that create reassortant strains, causing the human pandemics. In this paper, we apply several statistical techniques to an ensemble of publicly available swine viruses to study the reassortment phenomena. The reassortment patterns in swine viruses confirm previous results found in human viruses that the glycoprotein coding segments reassort most often. Moreover, one of the polymerase segments (PB1), reassorted in the strains responsible for the last two human pandemics of 1957 and 1968, also reassorts frequently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khiabanian et al. (2009) studied Swine influenza. Swine influenza viruses was evaluated on Reassortment patterns. Statistical analysis of swine influenza viruses demonstrated that glycoprotein coding segments and the PB1 polymerase segment reassort most frequently.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from PLoS Currents